State ex rel. Toncray v. Summit County Board of Elections

428 N.E.2d 401, 68 Ohio St. 2d 38, 22 Ohio Op. 3d 179, 1981 Ohio LEXIS 613
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided October 29, 1981·No. No. 81-1529·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Relator’s complaint does not seek relief which may be granted in an action in prohibition. Prohibition lies to prevent the usurpation of judicial or quasi-judicial power. See State, ex rel. Lehmann, v. Cmich (1970), 23 Ohio St. 2d 11. The action of a board of elections in placing issues on the ballot is not an exercise of quasi-judicial power. State, ex rel. Williams, v. Brown (1977), 52 Ohio St. 2d 13, 16; State, ex rel. O’Grady, v. Brown (1976), 48 Ohio St. 2d 17, 20.

[39]*39Accordingly, the writ is denied.

Writ denied.

Celebrezze, C. J., W. Brown, Sweeney, Locher, Holmes, C. Brown and Krupansky, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. Toncray v. Summit County Board of Elections, 428 N.E.2d 401, 68 Ohio St. 2d 38, 22 Ohio Op. 3d 179, 1981 Ohio LEXIS 613 (Ohio 1981).

428 N.E.2d 401 (State ex rel. Toncray v. Summit County Board of Elections) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related