State ex rel. Toncray v. Summit County Board of Elections
Opinion
Relator’s complaint does not seek relief which may be granted in an action in prohibition. Prohibition lies to prevent the usurpation of judicial or quasi-judicial power. See State, ex rel. Lehmann, v. Cmich (1970), 23 Ohio St. 2d 11. The action of a board of elections in placing issues on the ballot is not an exercise of quasi-judicial power. State, ex rel. Williams, v. Brown (1977), 52 Ohio St. 2d 13, 16; State, ex rel. O’Grady, v. Brown (1976), 48 Ohio St. 2d 17, 20.
[39]*39Accordingly, the writ is denied.
Writ denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
428 N.E.2d 401 (State ex rel. Toncray v. Summit County Board of Elections) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.