State ex rel. Tolle v. Spherion of Mid-Ohio, Inc.

Ohio Supreme Court

State ex rel. Tolle v. Spherion of Mid-Ohio, Inc.

2017 Ohio 2923, 80 N.E.3d 456, 150 Ohio St. 3d 182

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided May 23, 2017·No. No. 2015-1717·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of State ex rel. Cordell v. Pallet Cos., Inc., 149 Ohio St.3d 483, 2016-Ohio-8446, 75 N.E.3d 1230.

Badnell & Dick Co., L.P.A., and Kelly L. Badnell, for appellee. Lee M. Smith & Associates Co., L.P.A., and Elizabeth P. Weeden, for appellant Spherion of Mid-Ohio, Inc. Michael DeWine, Attorney General, and Kevin J. Reis, Assistant Attorney General, for appellant Industrial Commission. O’Connor, C.J., and French, O’Neill, Fischer, and DeWine, JJ., concur. O’Donnell and Kennedy, JJ., dissent and would schedule oral argument and-issue a ruling on the merits following oral argument.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of State ex rel. Cordell v. Pallet Cos., Inc., 149 Ohio St.3d 483, 2016-Ohio-8446, 75 N.E.3d 1230.

Badnell & Dick Co., L.P.A., and Kelly L. Badnell, for appellee. Lee M. Smith & Associates Co., L.P.A., and Elizabeth P. Weeden, for appellant Spherion of Mid-Ohio, Inc. Michael DeWine, Attorney General, and Kevin J. Reis, Assistant Attorney General, for appellant Industrial Commission. O’Connor, C.J., and French, O’Neill, Fischer, and DeWine, JJ., concur. O’Donnell and Kennedy, JJ., dissent and would schedule oral argument and-issue a ruling on the merits following oral argument.

State ex rel. Tolle v. Spherion of Mid-Ohio, Inc., 2017 Ohio 2923, 80 N.E.3d 456, 150 Ohio St. 3d 182 (Ohio 2017).

Pincite

2017 Ohio 2923 (State ex rel. Tolle v. Spherion of Mid-Ohio, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related