State ex rel. Toledo-Maumee Raceways, Inc. v. Hackett

Ohio Supreme Court

State ex rel. Toledo-Maumee Raceways, Inc. v. Hackett

173 Ohio St. (N.S.) 258

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedMarch 28, 1962

DocketNo. 37305

StatusPublished

This text of 173 Ohio St. (N.S.) 258 (State ex rel. Toledo-Maumee Raceways, Inc. v. Hackett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Toledo-Maumee Raceways, Inc. v. Hackett, 173 Ohio St. (N.S.) 258 (Ohio 1962).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Appellee has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal for the reason that the cause is presently moot. It appearing from the record that the cause has become moot, the motion to dismiss is sustained and the appeal dismissed.

Appeal dismissed.

Weygandt, C. J., Zimmerman, Taet, Matthias, Bell, Kerns and O’Neill, JJ., concur. Kerns, J., of the Second Appellate District, sitting by designation in the place and stead of Herbert, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Appellee has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal for the reason that the cause is presently moot. It appearing from the record that the cause has become moot, the motion to dismiss is sustained and the appeal dismissed.

Appeal dismissed.

Weygandt, C. J., Zimmerman, Taet, Matthias, Bell, Kerns and O’Neill, JJ., concur. Kerns, J., of the Second Appellate District, sitting by designation in the place and stead of Herbert, J.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

173 Ohio St. (N.S.) 258, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-toledo-maumee-raceways-inc-v-hackett-ohio-1962.