State ex rel. Toledo Hosp. v. Ohio Bur. of Workers' Comp.

Ohio Supreme Court

State ex rel. Toledo Hosp. v. Ohio Bur. of Workers' Comp.

1998 Ohio 350, 84 Ohio St. 3d 228

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedDecember 30, 1998

Docket1996-1656

StatusPublished

This text of 1998 Ohio 350 (State ex rel. Toledo Hosp. v. Ohio Bur. of Workers' Comp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Toledo Hosp. v. Ohio Bur. of Workers' Comp., 1998 Ohio 350, 84 Ohio St. 3d 228 (Ohio 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 84 Ohio St.3d 228.]

THE STATE EX REL. TOLEDO HOSPITAL, APPELLEE, v. ADMR., OHIO BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION, ET AL., APPELLEES; KANARY, APPELLANT. [Cite as State ex rel. Toledo Hosp. v. Ohio Bur. of Workers’ Comp., 1998-Ohio-350.] Workers’ compensation–Court of appeals’ judgment reversed and order of Industrial Commission reinstated. (No. 96-1656–Submitted October 27, 1998–Decided December 30, 1998.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 95APD04-424. __________________ Marshall & Melhorn and David L. O’Connell, for appellee Toledo Hospital. Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and Reeve W. Kelsey, Assistant Attorney General, for appellees Adminstrator, Bureau of Workers’ Compensation, and Industrial Commission. Dorothy B. McCrory & Associates, Christopher S. Clark and Kurt M. Young, for appellant John E. Kanary. __________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed, and the order of the Industrial Commission is reinstated. DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY and PFEIFER, JJ., concur. MOYER, C.J., COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., dissent. __________________ LUNDBERG STRATTON, J., dissenting. {¶ 2} Because I would affirm the judgment of the court of appeals, I respectfully dissent. MOYER, C.J., and COOK, J., concur in the foregoing dissenting opinion. __________________

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 84 Ohio St.3d 228.]

THE STATE EX REL. TOLEDO HOSPITAL, APPELLEE, v. ADMR., OHIO BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION, ET AL., APPELLEES; KANARY, APPELLANT. [Cite as State ex rel. Toledo Hosp. v. Ohio Bur. of Workers’ Comp., 1998-Ohio-350.] Workers’ compensation–Court of appeals’ judgment reversed and order of Industrial Commission reinstated. (No. 96-1656–Submitted October 27, 1998–Decided December 30, 1998.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 95APD04-424. __________________ Marshall & Melhorn and David L. O’Connell, for appellee Toledo Hospital. Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and Reeve W. Kelsey, Assistant Attorney General, for appellees Adminstrator, Bureau of Workers’ Compensation, and Industrial Commission. Dorothy B. McCrory & Associates, Christopher S. Clark and Kurt M. Young, for appellant John E. Kanary. __________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed, and the order of the Industrial Commission is reinstated. DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY and PFEIFER, JJ., concur. MOYER, C.J., COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., dissent. __________________ LUNDBERG STRATTON, J., dissenting. {¶ 2} Because I would affirm the judgment of the court of appeals, I respectfully dissent. MOYER, C.J., and COOK, J., concur in the foregoing dissenting opinion. __________________

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1998 Ohio 350, 84 Ohio St. 3d 228, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-toledo-hosp-v-ohio-bur-of-workers-comp-ohio-1998.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack