State ex rel. Toledo Blade Co. v. Henry Cty. Court of Common Pleas

925 N.E.2d 619, 124 Ohio St. 3d 1554
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedApril 28, 2010
Docket2010-0161
StatusPublished

This text of 925 N.E.2d 619 (State ex rel. Toledo Blade Co. v. Henry Cty. Court of Common Pleas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State ex rel. Toledo Blade Co. v. Henry Cty. Court of Common Pleas, 925 N.E.2d 619, 124 Ohio St. 3d 1554 (Ohio 2010).

Opinion

In Prohibition. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of prohibition. Upon consideration of the motion for admission pro hac vice of Lucy A. Dalglish, Gregg P. Leslie, and Mara E. Zimmerman by Monica L. Dias,

It is ordered by the court that the motion is granted, consistent with the opinion released on April 13, 2010. See opinion at 125 Ohio St.3d 149, 2010-Ohio-1533, 926 N.E.2d 634.

Pfeifer, Acting C.J. The late Chief Justice Thomas J. Moyer did not participate in the ruling in this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
925 N.E.2d 619, 124 Ohio St. 3d 1554, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-toledo-blade-co-v-henry-cty-court-of-common-pleas-ohio-2010.