State ex rel. Toledo Blade Co. v. Hancock Cty. Bd. of Commrs.

683 N.E.2d 789, 79 Ohio St. 3d 1486
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedSeptember 3, 1997
Docket97-1013
StatusPublished

This text of 683 N.E.2d 789 (State ex rel. Toledo Blade Co. v. Hancock Cty. Bd. of Commrs.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State ex rel. Toledo Blade Co. v. Hancock Cty. Bd. of Commrs., 683 N.E.2d 789, 79 Ohio St. 3d 1486 (Ohio 1997).

Opinion

In Mandamus. On motion for issuance of peremptory writ and on answer of respondent. Sua sponte, alternative writ granted.

Pfeifer, J., dissents and would grant a peremptory writ and attorney fees.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
683 N.E.2d 789, 79 Ohio St. 3d 1486, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-toledo-blade-co-v-hancock-cty-bd-of-commrs-ohio-1997.