State ex rel. Toerner v. Common Pleas Court
277 N.E.2d 209, 28 Ohio St. 2d 213, 57 Ohio Op. 2d 439, 1971 Ohio LEXIS 395
This text of 277 N.E.2d 209 (State ex rel. Toerner v. Common Pleas Court) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
State ex rel. Toerner v. Common Pleas Court, 277 N.E.2d 209, 28 Ohio St. 2d 213, 57 Ohio Op. 2d 439, 1971 Ohio LEXIS 395 (Ohio 1971).
Opinion
The judgment of the Court of Appeals is affirmed for the reason that the complaint for a writ of prohibition does not state a cause of action. Prohibition is not a substitute for appeal.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
State ex rel. Hardesty v. Williamson
459 N.E.2d 552 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1984)
State ex rel. Shoop v. Mitrovich
448 N.E.2d 800 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1983)
DuBose v. Court of Common Pleas of Trumbull County
413 N.E.2d 1205 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1980)
State ex rel. Zakany v. Avellone
387 N.E.2d 1373 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1979)
State v. Ruppert
375 N.E.2d 1250 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1978)
State ex rel. Heimann v. George
344 N.E.2d 130 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1976)
State ex rel. Gilla v. Fellerhoff
338 N.E.2d 522 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1975)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
277 N.E.2d 209, 28 Ohio St. 2d 213, 57 Ohio Op. 2d 439, 1971 Ohio LEXIS 395, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-toerner-v-common-pleas-court-ohio-1971.