State ex rel. Titus v. 19th Judicial District Court, Parish of East Baton Rouge

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State ex rel. Titus v. 19th Judicial District Court, Parish of East Baton Rouge

547 So. 2d 375, 1989 La. LEXIS 1883, 1989 WL 92087

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedAugust 15, 1989

DocketNo. 89-KH-1840

StatusPublished

This text of 547 So. 2d 375 (State ex rel. Titus v. 19th Judicial District Court, Parish of East Baton Rouge) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Titus v. 19th Judicial District Court, Parish of East Baton Rouge, 547 So. 2d 375, 1989 La. LEXIS 1883, 1989 WL 92087 (La. 1989).

Pincite

Opinion

In re Titus, Chyrone; —Plaintiff(s); applying for writ of mandamus and supervisory and/or remedial writ.; Parish of East Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court, Div. “C”, No. 2-2-76-946.

The relator represents that the district court has failed to act timely on a motion to correct an illegal sentence he has filed. If relator’s representation is correct, the district court is ordered to consider and act on the motion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Titus, Chyrone; —Plaintiff(s); applying for writ of mandamus and supervisory and/or remedial writ.; Parish of East Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court, Div. “C”, No. 2-2-76-946.

The relator represents that the district court has failed to act timely on a motion to correct an illegal sentence he has filed. If relator’s representation is correct, the district court is ordered to consider and act on the motion.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

547 So. 2d 375, 1989 La. LEXIS 1883, 1989 WL 92087, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-titus-v-19th-judicial-district-court-parish-of-east-baton-la-1989.