State Ex Rel. Tippins v. Rowe

150 So. 591, 112 Fla. 380
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided October 17, 1933·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

*381 Davis, C. J.

This is an original proceeding in prohibition wherein a rule nisi was issued against the Circuit Judge of the Seventh Judicial Circuit and William Cobb, as Receiver of the Circuit Court, to prohibit the respondents from exercising further jurisdiction and powers under certain orders .alleged in the petition to have been duly superseded by appeals taken to this Court in an equity case wherein Belle Mead Development Corporation was complainant, and Florida East Coast Bulb Farms, Inc., George L. Tippins, et al., were defendants.

The appeals in connection with which the rule nisi was issued, have now been decided, so any further consideration of the question whether a permanent writ of prohibition should issue therein has now become immaterial, inasmuch as the mandate we will issue on the decisions on the appeal involved will control all future proceedings' by the respondents in this cause, the Circuit Judge and his receiver.

This proceeding is therefore dismissed at costs of relator.

Whitfield, Ellis, Terrell, Brown and Buford, J. J., •concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State Ex Rel. Tippins v. Rowe, 150 So. 591, 112 Fla. 380 (Fla. 1933).

150 So. 591 (State Ex Rel. Tippins v. Rowe) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Tippins v. Belle Mead Development Corp.
188 So. 787 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1935)