State ex rel. Timson v. Petro

Ohio Supreme Court

State ex rel. Timson v. Petro

676 N.E.2d 901, 78 Ohio St. 3d 1432, 1997 Ohio LEXIS 992

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedMarch 17, 1997

Docket97-374

StatusPublished

This text of 676 N.E.2d 901 (State ex rel. Timson v. Petro) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Timson v. Petro, 676 N.E.2d 901, 78 Ohio St. 3d 1432, 1997 Ohio LEXIS 992 (Ohio 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

In Mandamus, Prohibition and Procedendo. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for writs of mandamus, prohibition, and procedendo. Upon consideration of relator’s application for dismissal of the first, second, third, fifth, sixth, and seventh causes of action,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the application for dismissal of the first, second, third, fifth, sixth, and seventh causes of action be, and hereby is, granted.

The fourth cause of action remains pending.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Mandamus, Prohibition and Procedendo. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for writs of mandamus, prohibition, and procedendo. Upon consideration of relator’s application for dismissal of the first, second, third, fifth, sixth, and seventh causes of action,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the application for dismissal of the first, second, third, fifth, sixth, and seventh causes of action be, and hereby is, granted.

The fourth cause of action remains pending.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

676 N.E.2d 901, 78 Ohio St. 3d 1432, 1997 Ohio LEXIS 992, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-timson-v-petro-ohio-1997.