State ex rel. Timson v. Liston

673 N.E.2d 134, 77 Ohio St. 3d 1467, 1996 Ohio LEXIS 2092
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 18, 1996
Docket96-2254
StatusPublished

This text of 673 N.E.2d 134 (State ex rel. Timson v. Liston) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State ex rel. Timson v. Liston, 673 N.E.2d 134, 77 Ohio St. 3d 1467, 1996 Ohio LEXIS 2092 (Ohio 1996).

Opinion

In Mandamus. On motion to file exhibits to complaint, motion for issuance of peremptory writ, motion to dismiss of Ronald J. O’Brien and Robert Levering, motion for issuance of peremptory writ, motion for more definite statement, and motion for court order. Motions to dismiss sustained. Cause dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Stratton, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
673 N.E.2d 134, 77 Ohio St. 3d 1467, 1996 Ohio LEXIS 2092, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-timson-v-liston-ohio-1996.