State ex rel. Timson v. Lashutka

670 N.E.2d 1000, 77 Ohio St. 3d 1411, 1996 Ohio LEXIS 1566
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 16, 1996
Docket96-2090
StatusPublished

This text of 670 N.E.2d 1000 (State ex rel. Timson v. Lashutka) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State ex rel. Timson v. Lashutka, 670 N.E.2d 1000, 77 Ohio St. 3d 1411, 1996 Ohio LEXIS 1566 (Ohio 1996).

Opinion

In Mandamus. On motion for peremptory writ of prohibition. Sua sponte, cause dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Stratton, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
670 N.E.2d 1000, 77 Ohio St. 3d 1411, 1996 Ohio LEXIS 1566, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-timson-v-lashutka-ohio-1996.