State ex rel. Timothy v. Gallagher

• Court: Ohio Court of Appeals
• Decided: June 26, 2026
• Docket: 116362
• Status: Published

Opinion

[Cite as State ex rel. Timothy v. Gallagher, 2026-Ohio-2549.]

COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO

EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA

STATE EX REL. AARON TIMOTHY, :

Relator, : No. 116362

v. :

KELLY ANN GALLAGHER, :

Respondent. :

JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION

JUDGMENT: COMPLAINT DISMISSED DATED: June 26, 2026

Writ of Procedendo Motion No. 594724 Order No. 596436

Appearances:

Aaron Timothy, pro se.

Michael C. O’Malley, Cuyahoga County Prosecuting Attorney, and Bridget E. Dever, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for respondent.

ANITA LASTER MAYS, J.:

Aaron Timothy, the relator, has filed a complaint for procedendo

through which he seeks an order from this court that requires Judge Kelly Ann

Gallagher, the respondent, to render rulings with regard to a second successive petition for postconviction relief and a motion to withdraw guilty plea, both filed in

State v. Timothy, Cuyahoga C.P. No. CR-23-677697-A. Judge Gallagher has filed a

motion to dismiss that is granted because the complaint for procedendo is moot and

Timothy has failed to comply with R.C. 2969.25(A) and (C).

Attached to the motion to dismiss the complaint for procedendo is a

copy of a judgment entry, journalized April 23, 2026, which demonstrates Judge

Gallagher has issued a ruling with regard to Timothy’s successive petition for

postconviction relief. In addition, a review of the criminal docket maintained in

CR- 23-677697-A demonstrates that Judge Gallagher has issued a ruling,

journalized November 14, 2025, with regard to Timothy’s motion to withdraw guilty

plea. Relief is unwarranted because the request for a writ of procedendo is moot

and procedendo will not compel the performance of a duty that has already been

performed. State ex rel. Ames v. Pokorny, 2021-Ohio-2070, ¶ 7; Thompson v.

Donnelly, 2018-Ohio-4073, ¶ 5; State ex rel. S.Y.C. v. Floyd, 2020-Ohio-5189, ¶ 9

(8th Dist.).

Finally, we find that Timothy’s complaint for a writ of procedendo

fails to comply with R.C. 2969.25(A) and (C). Specifically, Timothy failed to file an

affidavit of prior civil actions as required by R.C. 2969.25(A). In addition, Timothy

has failed to provide a certified copy of the institutional cashier’s statement, where

he is incarcerated, setting forth the balance in his inmate account as required by R.C.

2969.25(C). The requirements of R.C. 2969.25 are mandatory, and the failure to

provide this court with an affidavit of prior civil actions and a certified institutional cashier’s statement requires dismissal of Timothy’s complaint for procedendo. State

ex rel. Washington v. Ohio Adult Parole Auth., 87 Ohio St.3d 258, 258 (1999); State

ex rel. Zanders v. Ohio Parole Bd., 82 Ohio St.3d 421, 422 (1998). The failure to

comply with R.C. 2969.25(A) and (C) cannot be cured by amendment or later filings.

State ex rel. Watkins v. Andrews, 2015-Ohio-1100, ¶ 8; Fuqua v. Williams, 2003-

Ohio-5533, ¶ 9.

Accordingly, we grant Judge Gallagher’s motion to dismiss. Costs

waived. The court directs the clerk of courts to serve all parties with notice of this

judgment and date of entry upon the journal as required by Civ.R. 58(B).

Complaint dismissed.

________________________ ANITA LASTER MAYS, JUDGE

EILEEN T. GALLAGHER, P.J., and EMANUELLA D. GROVES, J., CONCUR