State ex rel. Thomson v. State Bd. of Psychology

895 N.E.2d 563, 119 Ohio St. 3d 1500
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided October 29, 2008·No. 2008-1611·Published

Opinion

In Mandamus. On relator’s complaint in mandamus and motion to amend affidavit of prior actions, respondent Bureau of Motor Vehicles’ answer and motion for judgment on the pleadings, respondent State Board of Psychology’s answer, and relator’s motions audi alteram partem. Motion for judgment on the pleadings granted. Relator’s motions denied as moot. Cause dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. Thomson v. State Bd. of Psychology, 895 N.E.2d 563, 119 Ohio St. 3d 1500 (Ohio 2008).

895 N.E.2d 563 (State ex rel. Thomson v. State Bd. of Psychology) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.