State ex rel. Thomson v. State Bd. of Psychology

Ohio Supreme Court

State ex rel. Thomson v. State Bd. of Psychology

895 N.E.2d 563, 119 Ohio St. 3d 1500

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedOctober 29, 2008

Docket2008-1611

StatusPublished

This text of 895 N.E.2d 563 (State ex rel. Thomson v. State Bd. of Psychology) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Thomson v. State Bd. of Psychology, 895 N.E.2d 563, 119 Ohio St. 3d 1500 (Ohio 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

In Mandamus. On relator’s complaint in mandamus and motion to amend affidavit of prior actions, respondent Bureau of Motor Vehicles’ answer and motion for judgment on the pleadings, respondent State Board of Psychology’s answer, and relator’s motions audi alteram partem. Motion for judgment on the pleadings granted. Relator’s motions denied as moot. Cause dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Mandamus. On relator’s complaint in mandamus and motion to amend affidavit of prior actions, respondent Bureau of Motor Vehicles’ answer and motion for judgment on the pleadings, respondent State Board of Psychology’s answer, and relator’s motions audi alteram partem. Motion for judgment on the pleadings granted. Relator’s motions denied as moot. Cause dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

895 N.E.2d 563, 119 Ohio St. 3d 1500, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-thomson-v-state-bd-of-psychology-ohio-2008.