State ex rel. Thomas v. State

687 So. 2d 397, 1997 La. LEXIS 296, 1997 WL 42337
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State ex rel. Thomas v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1994 La. LEXIS 2944
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided January 31, 1997·No. No. 95-KH-1319·Published

Opinion

In re Thomas, Willie Scott; — Plaintiff(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writ; Parish of St. Mary, 16th Judicial District Court, Div. “B”, No. 108,249.

Writ denied. Although the district court originally imposed an illegally indeterminate sentence, see Sentencing Tr. at 20, the court has effectively resenteneed relator by recognizing that only two years of his sentence were to be served without benefit of parole, probation, or suspension of sentence, see, e.g., State ex rel. Dawson v. Ballard, 460 So.2d 595 (La.1984) (district courts must re-sentence inmates who have received not “fully determinate sentence(s) as to duration of period without benefit of parole.”), as Department of Public Safety and Corrections records reflect.

JOHNSON, J., not on panel.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. Thomas v. State, 687 So. 2d 397, 1997 La. LEXIS 296, 1997 WL 42337 (La. 1997).

687 So. 2d 397 (State ex rel. Thomas v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State Ex Rel. Dawson v. Ballard
460 So. 2d 595 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1984)