State ex rel. the Attorney General v. Barrow

29 La. Ann. 243
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedApril 15, 1877
DocketNo. 6349
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 29 La. Ann. 243 (State ex rel. the Attorney General v. Barrow) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State ex rel. the Attorney General v. Barrow, 29 La. Ann. 243 (La. 1877).

Opinions

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Wyly, J.

In this proceeding under the intrusion act for the office of tax collector of the Third District of Now Orleans there was judgment for defendant, and plaintiffs appeal.

Thomas P. Carey was appointed to said office on the eighteenth of January, 1876. On the tenth of May defendant was appointed (vice Carey, removed,) by the Lieutenant Governor, acting as Governor in the •absence of the Governor from the State.

i The question as to the authority of the Governor to remove a tax collector and appoint his successor is no longer an open one. 25 An. 119; 25 An. 396; 26 An. 537.

In the absence of the Governor from the State in this instance the Lieutenant Governor could discharge the duties of the office of Governor. Constitution, article 53.

It is unnecessary to examine the hills of exceptions to the exclusion of evidence at the trial, because if all the testimony, the rejection of which is complained of, were adduced it would not alter the result.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ex Parte Crump
1913 OK CR 272 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1913)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
29 La. Ann. 243, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-the-attorney-general-v-barrow-la-1877.