State Ex Rel. Texas Department of Transportation v. Precision Solar Controls, Inc.

220 S.W.3d 494, 50 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 583, 2007 Tex. LEXIS 312, 2007 WL 1029612
CourtTexas Supreme Court
DecidedApril 5, 2007
Docket06-0348
StatusPublished
Cited by10 cases

This text of 220 S.W.3d 494 (State Ex Rel. Texas Department of Transportation v. Precision Solar Controls, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State Ex Rel. Texas Department of Transportation v. Precision Solar Controls, Inc., 220 S.W.3d 494, 50 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 583, 2007 Tex. LEXIS 312, 2007 WL 1029612 (Tex. 2007).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The State sued Precision Solar Controls, Inc. for breach of contract, breach of warranty, and quantum meruit, alleging that traffic signal displays made by Precision were defective. Precision denied the State’s allegations and counterclaimed for damages for business disparagement. The trial court denied the State’s plea to the jurisdiction based on sovereign immunity, and, on the State’s interlocutory appeal, the court of appeals affirmed. 188 S.W.3d 364 (Tex.App.-Austin 2006).

The court of appeals relied on our first opinion in Reata Construction Corp. v. City of Dallas, which we have since withdrawn and replaced. 197 S.W.3d 371 (Tex.2006). We held that a governmental entity that brings an action waives immunity from suit for claims that are germane to, connected with, and properly defensive to its action, to the extent of an offset. Id. at 373. The State argues that it has not by its action waived immunity for an intentional tort claim like Precision’s. Such arguments should be further considered by the lower court in light of Reata.

Accordingly, we grant the State’s motion for rehearing, withdraw our order denying its petition for review, grant its petition, and, without hearing oral argument, vacate the court of appeals’ judgment and remand the case to the trial court for further proceedings. Tex.R.App. P. 59.1.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
220 S.W.3d 494, 50 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 583, 2007 Tex. LEXIS 312, 2007 WL 1029612, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-texas-department-of-transportation-v-precision-solar-tex-2007.