State Ex Rel. Terrell-Hedges Co. v. Moody
80 So. 828, 202 Ala. 444, 1919 Ala. LEXIS 275
Opinions
The majority of the court, consisting of ANDERSON, C. J., McCLEL-LAJN, SOMERVILLE, GARDNER), and THOMAS, JJ., are of the opinion that the decision of the Court of Appeals was correct and should be affirmed. This results in a denial of the application for certiorari.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State Ex Rel. Terrell-Hedges Co. v. Moody, 80 So. 828, 202 Ala. 444, 1919 Ala. LEXIS 275 (Ala. 1919).
80 So. 828 (State Ex Rel. Terrell-Hedges Co. v. Moody) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Chism v. Jefferson County
954 So. 2d 1058 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 2006)
County Board of Education of Coffee County v. City of Elba
135 So. 2d 812 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1961)
State Ex Rel. Russell County v. Fourth National Bank
117 So. 2d 145 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1959)
Carnley v. Moore
118 So. 409 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1928)
Town of Camden v. Fairbanks, Morse & Co.
86 So. 8 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1920)