State ex rel. Teno v. State

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State ex rel. Teno v. State

161 So. 3d 647, 2015 La. LEXIS 715, 2015 WL 1607940

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedMarch 27, 2015

DocketNo. 2014-KH-1158

StatusPublished

This text of 161 So. 3d 647 (State ex rel. Teno v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Teno v. State, 161 So. 3d 647, 2015 La. LEXIS 715, 2015 WL 1607940 (La. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

In re Teno, Jeremiah R.; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Beauregard, 36th Judicial District Court Div. B, No. CR10-701; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. KH 14-00309.

Granted. The district court’s order denying relator post-conviction relief is vacated and this case is remanded for further proceedings. The district court is ordered to appoint counsel for relator and to conduct an evidentiary hearing on his claim that his trial attorney rendered ineffective assistance by advising him to withdraw from a plea bargain with the state, whereby two of three charges would be dismissed and the state would forego enhanced habitual offender sentencing under La.R.S. 15:529.1 and instead recommend on the remaining count a sentence at half the maximum term of imprisonment provided for the offense, thereby prompting relator to elect a jury trial which resulted in conviction and habitual offender sentencing on all three counts far in excess of what the state would recommend as part of the failed plea bargain. See Lafler v. Cooper, 566 U.S. -, 132 S.Ct. 1376, 182 L.Ed.2d 398 (2012).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Teno, Jeremiah R.; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Beauregard, 36th Judicial District Court Div. B, No. CR10-701; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. KH 14-00309.

Granted. The district court’s order denying relator post-conviction relief is vacated and this case is remanded for further proceedings. The district court is ordered to appoint counsel for relator and to conduct an evidentiary hearing on his claim that his trial attorney rendered ineffective assistance by advising him to withdraw from a plea bargain with the state, whereby two of three charges would be dismissed and the state would forego enhanced habitual offender sentencing under La.R.S. 15:529.1 and instead recommend on the remaining count a sentence at half the maximum term of imprisonment provided for the offense, thereby prompting relator to elect a jury trial which resulted in conviction and habitual offender sentencing on all three counts far in excess of what the state would recommend as part of the failed plea bargain. See Lafler v. Cooper, 566 U.S. -, 132 S.Ct. 1376, 182 L.Ed.2d 398 (2012).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

161 So. 3d 647, 2015 La. LEXIS 715, 2015 WL 1607940, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-teno-v-state-la-2015.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack