State ex rel. Tecumseh Products Co. v. Indus. Comm.
This text of 1998 Ohio 255 (State ex rel. Tecumseh Products Co. v. Indus. Comm.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 82 Ohio St.3d 181.]
THE STATE EX REL. TECUMSEH PRODUCTS COMPANY, APPELLANT, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO ET AL., APPELLEES. [Cite as State ex rel. Tecumseh Products Co. v. Indus. Comm., 1998-Ohio-255.] Workers’ compensation—Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed. (No. 95-2190—Submitted May 12, 1998—Decided June 17, 1998.) Appeal from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 94APD10-1432. __________________ Bugbee & Conkle, Robert P. King and David M. McCarty, for appellant. Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and William J. McDonald, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee Industrial Commission of Ohio. Chester T. Freeman Co., L.P.A., and William R. Polhamus, for appellee John Dear. __________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed. MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. __________________
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1998 Ohio 255, 82 Ohio St. 3d 181, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-tecumseh-products-co-v-indus-comm-ohio-1998.