State ex rel. Tebbetts v. Holtcamp

Supreme Court of Missouri

State ex rel. Tebbetts v. Holtcamp

158 S.W. 853, 252 Mo. 333, 1913 Mo. LEXIS 116

CourtSupreme Court of Missouri

DecidedJuly 10, 1913

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 158 S.W. 853 (State ex rel. Tebbetts v. Holtcamp) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Tebbetts v. Holtcamp, 158 S.W. 853, 252 Mo. 333, 1913 Mo. LEXIS 116 (Mo. 1913).

Pincite

Opinion

FARIS, J.

This is a companion case to that of In re Letitia Todd Breck and Barbara Breck, Minors; Lewis B. Tebbetts, Petitioner, v. Rebecca Rickart and Lloyd H. Rickart, Respondents, decided at this term, involving the writ of habeas corpus. [Ante, p. 302.] In the latter case the points involved here were fully considered; the two cases having been argued and submitted together. For the reasons given in the habeas corpus case, just decided, it results that the writ of certiorari issued herein should be quashed, and it is so ordered.

Brown and Walker, JJ., concur; Lamm, G. J., and Woodson, J., concur for reasons set out in concurring opinion of Graves, J., in In re Letitia Todd Breck et al., minors, Tebbetts, petitioners v. Rebecca Rickart et al., Respondents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

FARIS, J.

This is a companion case to that of In re Letitia Todd Breck and Barbara Breck, Minors; Lewis B. Tebbetts, Petitioner, v. Rebecca Rickart and Lloyd H. Rickart, Respondents, decided at this term, involving the writ of habeas corpus. [Ante, p. 302.] In the latter case the points involved here were fully considered; the two cases having been argued and submitted together. For the reasons given in the habeas corpus case, just decided, it results that the writ of certiorari issued herein should be quashed, and it is so ordered.

Brown and Walker, JJ., concur; Lamm, G. J., and Woodson, J., concur for reasons set out in concurring opinion of Graves, J., in In re Letitia Todd Breck et al., minors, Tebbetts, petitioners v. Rebecca Rickart et al., Respondents.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

158 S.W. 853, 252 Mo. 333, 1913 Mo. LEXIS 116, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-tebbetts-v-holtcamp-mo-1913.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack