State ex rel. Teasdale v. Smith

101 Mo. 174
CourtSupreme Court of Missouri
DecidedApril 15, 1890
StatusPublished
Cited by22 cases

This text of 101 Mo. 174 (State ex rel. Teasdale v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State ex rel. Teasdale v. Smith, 101 Mo. 174 (Mo. 1890).

Opinion

Sherwood, J.

This is an application for a writ of certiorari directed to the judges of the Kansas City court of appeals.

This writ, under constitutional provisions, is strictly the common-law writ of that name ; it only brings up the record, and can only reach errors or defects which appear on the face of the record of the tribunal to which it is issued, and which are jurisdictional in their nature. Railroad v. State Board, 64 Mo. 294. As the Kansas City court of appeals confessedly had jurisdiction this must prevent the issuance of the writ prayed for, and it is denied.

All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State Ex Rel. Kennedy v. Remmers
101 S.W.2d 70 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1936)
State Ex Rel. Aquamsi Land Co. v. Hostetter
79 S.W.2d 463 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1935)
State Ex Rel. Barlow v. Holtcamp
14 S.W.2d 646 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1929)
State Ex Rel. Porter v. Falkenhainer
296 S.W. 386 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1927)
State Ex Rel. Hulen v. Trimble
275 S.W. 536 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1925)
State Ex Rel. Lunsford v. Landon
265 S.W. 529 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1924)
State ex rel. Gilman v. Robertson
175 S.W. 610 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1915)
State ex rel. United Railways Co. v. Reynolds
165 S.W. 729 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1914)
State ex rel. Barker v. Wurdeman
163 S.W. 849 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1914)
State ex rel. Curtis v. Broaddus
142 S.W. 340 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1911)
State ex rel. Kelley v. Wooten
122 S.W. 1103 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1909)
State ex rel. Parker-Washington Co. v. City of St. Louis
105 S.W. 748 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1907)
State ex rel. Marbury v. Tullock
82 S.W. 645 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1904)
State ex rel. Hobart v. Smith
73 S.W. 211 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1903)
State ex rel. Dalton v. Baker
70 S.W. 872 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1902)
State ex rel. Ballew v. Woodson
61 S.W. 252 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1901)
State ex rel. Hill v. Moore
84 Mo. App. 11 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1900)
State ex rel. Walker v. Dobson
36 S.W. 238 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1896)
State ex rel. Brennan v. Walbridge
62 Mo. App. 162 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1895)
State ex rel. Robinson v. Mayor of Aldermen
57 Mo. App. 192 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1894)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
101 Mo. 174, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-teasdale-v-smith-mo-1890.