State ex rel. Teagarden v. Branstool
7 N.E.3d 1238, 138 Ohio St. 3d 1487
This text of 7 N.E.3d 1238 (State ex rel. Teagarden v. Branstool) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
State ex rel. Teagarden v. Branstool, 7 N.E.3d 1238, 138 Ohio St. 3d 1487 (Ohio 2014).
Opinion
This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of mandamus.
Upon consideration of the joint motion to stay proceedings, it is ordered by the court that the motion is granted and the proceedings in this case are stayed pending further order of the court. It is further ordered that the parties shall notify the court promptly after relator’s resentencing.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
7 N.E.3d 1238, 138 Ohio St. 3d 1487, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-teagarden-v-branstool-ohio-2014.