State ex rel. Taylor v. Industrial Commission
This text of 450 N.E.2d 685 (State ex rel. Taylor v. Industrial Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
“* * * It is well established that mandamus will not lie where there is some evidence to support the finding of the Industrial Commission.” State, ex rel. Anderson, v. Indus. Comm. (1979), 60 Ohio St. 2d 106, 108 [24 O.O.3d 187]. Appellant contends that there was no evidence to support the commission’s conclusion that she was not permanently and totally disabled. The record shows, however, that at least one examining physician reported that appellant was not permanently and totally disabled. This [213]*213satisfies the quantum of proof necessary to meet this court’s standard. The judgment of the court of appeals is accordingly affirmed.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
450 N.E.2d 685, 5 Ohio St. 3d 212, 5 Ohio B. 454, 1983 Ohio LEXIS 752, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-taylor-v-industrial-commission-ohio-1983.