State ex rel. Taylor v. Industrial Commission
Opinions
“* * * It is well established that mandamus will not lie where there is some evidence to support the finding of the Industrial Commission.” State, ex rel. Anderson, v. Indus. Comm. (1979), 60 Ohio St. 2d 106, 108 [24 O.O.3d 187]. Appellant contends that there was no evidence to support the commission’s conclusion that she was not permanently and totally disabled. The record shows, however, that at least one examining physician reported that appellant was not permanently and totally disabled. This [213] satisfies the quantum of proof necessary to meet this court’s standard. The judgment of the court of appeals is accordingly affirmed.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
450 N.E.2d 685 (State ex rel. Taylor v. Industrial Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.