State ex rel. Taylor v. Cummings

Washington Supreme Court

State ex rel. Taylor v. Cummings

67 P. 565, 27 Wash. 316, 1902 Wash. LEXIS 394

Washington Supreme Court·Decided January 18, 1902·No. No. 4093·Published·Cited by 11 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This is a contest between the relator and respondent over an election, involving the' right to the office of road supervisor in road district No. 19 of King county, state of Washington, for the term of one year, to commence on the first Tuesday of January, 1901. Inasmuch as the term of office has expired, and there is no subject matter upon which the judgment of this court can operate, this cause will be dismissed under the rule announced in State ex rel. Daniels v. Prosser, 16 Wash. 608 [317]*317(48 Pac. 262) ; State ex rel. Coiner v. Wickersham, 16 Wash. 161 (47 Pac. 421) ; and Hice v. Orr, 16 Wash. 163 (47 Pac. 424).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This is a contest between the relator and respondent over an election, involving the' right to the office of road supervisor in road district No. 19 of King county, state of Washington, for the term of one year, to commence on the first Tuesday of January, 1901. Inasmuch as the term of office has expired, and there is no subject matter upon which the judgment of this court can operate, this cause will be dismissed under the rule announced in State ex rel. Daniels v. Prosser, 16 Wash. 608 [317]*317(48 Pac. 262) ; State ex rel. Coiner v. Wickersham, 16 Wash. 161 (47 Pac. 421) ; and Hice v. Orr, 16 Wash. 163 (47 Pac. 424).

State ex rel. Taylor v. Cummings, 67 P. 565, 27 Wash. 316, 1902 Wash. LEXIS 394 (Wash. 1902).

Pincite

67 P. 565 (State ex rel. Taylor v. Cummings) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related