State ex rel. Taylor v. Columbus Railway Co.

Ohio Supreme Court

State ex rel. Taylor v. Columbus Railway Co.

73 Ohio St. (N.S.) 363

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedNovember 21, 1905

DocketNo. 8657

StatusPublished

This text of 73 Ohio St. (N.S.) 363 (State ex rel. Taylor v. Columbus Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Taylor v. Columbus Railway Co., 73 Ohio St. (N.S.) 363 (Ohio 1905).

Pincite

Opinion

This case came oh to.be heard upon the transcript of the record of the circuit court of Franklin county and was ’argued by counsel. On consideration whereof it is ordered and adjudged by this court that' the judgment of the said circuit court be and the same is hereby affirmed on the sole ground that the defendant had present right to occupy the streets at the time of the commencement of this action. The other questions presented are not decided, and it appearing to this court that there were reasonable grounds [364]*364for this proceeding in error, it is ordered that no penalty be assessed herein. Ordered that the defendant in error recover from the plaintiff in error his costs herein, etc.

Davis, C. J., Shauck, Price, Crew and Spear, JJ., concur. Summers, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

This case came oh to.be heard upon the transcript of the record of the circuit court of Franklin county and was ’argued by counsel. On consideration whereof it is ordered and adjudged by this court that' the judgment of the said circuit court be and the same is hereby affirmed on the sole ground that the defendant had present right to occupy the streets at the time of the commencement of this action. The other questions presented are not decided, and it appearing to this court that there were reasonable grounds [364]*364for this proceeding in error, it is ordered that no penalty be assessed herein. Ordered that the defendant in error recover from the plaintiff in error his costs herein, etc.

Davis, C. J., Shauck, Price, Crew and Spear, JJ., concur. Summers, J., not participating.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

73 Ohio St. (N.S.) 363, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-taylor-v-columbus-railway-co-ohio-1905.