State ex rel. Tamco Distrib. Co. v. Indus. Comm.

Ohio Supreme Court

State ex rel. Tamco Distrib. Co. v. Indus. Comm.

2003 Ohio 369, 98 Ohio St. 3d 285

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedFebruary 12, 2003

Docket2002-0701

StatusPublished

This text of 2003 Ohio 369 (State ex rel. Tamco Distrib. Co. v. Indus. Comm.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Tamco Distrib. Co. v. Indus. Comm., 2003 Ohio 369, 98 Ohio St. 3d 285 (Ohio 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

[Cite as State ex rel. Tamco Distrib. Co. v. Indus. Comm., 98 Ohio St.3d 285, 2003-Ohio-369.]

THE STATE EX REL. TAMCO DISTRIBUTORS COMPANY, APPELLANT, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO ET AL., APPELLEES. [Cite as State ex rel. Tamco Distrib. Co. v. Indus. Comm., 98 Ohio St.3d 285, 2003-Ohio-369.] Workers’ compensation — Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed. (No. 2002-0701 — Submitted January 7, 2003 — Decided February 12, 2003.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 01AP-874. __________________ {¶1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals. MOYER, C.J., RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK, LUNDBERG STRATTON and O’CONNOR, JJ., concur. __________________ David R. Cook, for appellant. Jim Petro, Attorney General, and Keith D. Blosser, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee Industrial Commission of Ohio. Elliott, Heller, Maas, Moro & Magill Co., L.P.A., Robert J. Foley and Richard L. Magill, for appellee Marilyn D. Cramb. __________________

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[Cite as State ex rel. Tamco Distrib. Co. v. Indus. Comm., 98 Ohio St.3d 285, 2003-Ohio-369.]

THE STATE EX REL. TAMCO DISTRIBUTORS COMPANY, APPELLANT, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO ET AL., APPELLEES. [Cite as State ex rel. Tamco Distrib. Co. v. Indus. Comm., 98 Ohio St.3d 285, 2003-Ohio-369.] Workers’ compensation — Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed. (No. 2002-0701 — Submitted January 7, 2003 — Decided February 12, 2003.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 01AP-874. __________________ {¶1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals. MOYER, C.J., RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK, LUNDBERG STRATTON and O’CONNOR, JJ., concur. __________________ David R. Cook, for appellant. Jim Petro, Attorney General, and Keith D. Blosser, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee Industrial Commission of Ohio. Elliott, Heller, Maas, Moro & Magill Co., L.P.A., Robert J. Foley and Richard L. Magill, for appellee Marilyn D. Cramb. __________________

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2003 Ohio 369, 98 Ohio St. 3d 285, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-tamco-distrib-co-v-indus-comm-ohio-2003.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack