State ex rel. T. L. O.
This text of 448 A.2d 493 (State ex rel. T. L. O.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
We affirm the denial of the motion to suppress the evidence produced by the search of the juvenile’s purse substantially for the reasons expressed by Judge Nicola in his opinion reported at 178 N.J.Super. 329 (J. & D.R.Ct.1980).
However, we find that neither the record nor the findings and conclusions of the trial judge are sufficient for us to determine the sufficiency of the Miranda waiver which was assertedly made by or on behalf of the juvenile immediately before her [281]*281resumed questioning by the police officer. We must therefore remand the matter to the trial court for further proceedings and findings and conclusions in light of the principles enunciated in Edwards v. Arizona, 451 U.S. 477, 101 S.Ct. 1880, 68 L.Ed.2d 378 (1981) and State v. Fussell, 174 N.J.Super. 14 (App.Div.1980).
The final adjudication of delinquency entered on January 7, 1982 is vacated and the matter is remanded for further proceedings consistent herewith. We do not retain jurisdiction.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
448 A.2d 493, 185 N.J. Super. 279, 1982 N.J. Super. LEXIS 847, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-t-l-o-njsuperctappdiv-1982.