State Ex Rel. T. H. Mastin & Co. v. Knott

Supreme Court of Florida

State Ex Rel. T. H. Mastin & Co. v. Knott

167 So. 20, 123 Fla. 579

DecidedMarch 31, 1936

StatusPublished

This text of 167 So. 20 (State Ex Rel. T. H. Mastin & Co. v. Knott) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State Ex Rel. T. H. Mastin & Co. v. Knott, 167 So. 20, 123 Fla. 579 (Fla. 1936).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The motion to quash the alternative writ of mandamus in these cases is denied upon the authority of the decision in the case of State ex .rel. Fidelity and Casualty Company of New York, v. W. V. Knott, as Insurance Commissioner of the State of Florida, this day handed down, and respondent allowed ten days in which to answer.

Whitfield, C. J., and Terrell, Brown, Buford and Davis, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The motion to quash the alternative writ of mandamus in these cases is denied upon the authority of the decision in the case of State ex .rel. Fidelity and Casualty Company of New York, v. W. V. Knott, as Insurance Commissioner of the State of Florida, this day handed down, and respondent allowed ten days in which to answer.

Whitfield, C. J., and Terrell, Brown, Buford and Davis, J. J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

167 So. 20, 123 Fla. 579, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-t-h-mastin-co-v-knott-fla-1936.