State ex rel. Szabo v. Wiseman

Ohio Supreme Court

State ex rel. Szabo v. Wiseman

802 N.E.2d 1125, 101 Ohio St. 3d 1451

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedFebruary 6, 2004

Docket2003-2119

StatusPublished

This text of 802 N.E.2d 1125 (State ex rel. Szabo v. Wiseman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Szabo v. Wiseman, 802 N.E.2d 1125, 101 Ohio St. 3d 1451 (Ohio 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

In Mandamus. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of mandamus. Upon consideration of respondent’s motion to dismiss and relator’s motion for immediate protection,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion for immediate protection be denied and that the motion to dismiss be sustained.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor and O’Donnell, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Mandamus. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of mandamus. Upon consideration of respondent’s motion to dismiss and relator’s motion for immediate protection,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion for immediate protection be denied and that the motion to dismiss be sustained.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor and O’Donnell, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

802 N.E.2d 1125, 101 Ohio St. 3d 1451, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-szabo-v-wiseman-ohio-2004.