State ex rel. Sutton v. Criminal District Court

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State ex rel. Sutton v. Criminal District Court

558 So. 2d 1132, 1990 La. LEXIS 409, 1990 WL 10050

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedFebruary 5, 1990

DocketNo. 89-KH-2976

StatusPublished

This text of 558 So. 2d 1132 (State ex rel. Sutton v. Criminal District Court) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Sutton v. Criminal District Court, 558 So. 2d 1132, 1990 La. LEXIS 409, 1990 WL 10050 (La. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

In re Sutton, Ronald E.; — Plaintiffs); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “D”, No. 283-115.

The relator represents that the district court has failed to act timely on a writ of mandamus requesting the price of a multi-[1133]*1133pie offender hearing transcript he claims to have filed on or about October 20, 1989. If the relator’s representation is correct, the district court is ordered to consider and act on the mandamus.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Sutton, Ronald E.; — Plaintiffs); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “D”, No. 283-115.

The relator represents that the district court has failed to act timely on a writ of mandamus requesting the price of a multi-[1133]*1133pie offender hearing transcript he claims to have filed on or about October 20, 1989. If the relator’s representation is correct, the district court is ordered to consider and act on the mandamus.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

558 So. 2d 1132, 1990 La. LEXIS 409, 1990 WL 10050, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-sutton-v-criminal-district-court-la-1990.