State ex rel. SuperAmerica Group v. Plunkett

Ohio Supreme Court

State ex rel. SuperAmerica Group v. Plunkett

78 Ohio St. 3d 1401

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedFebruary 14, 1997

Docket97-41

StatusPublished

This text of 78 Ohio St. 3d 1401 (State ex rel. SuperAmerica Group v. Plunkett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. SuperAmerica Group v. Plunkett, 78 Ohio St. 3d 1401 (Ohio 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

In Mandamus. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of mandamus. Upon consideration of respondent’s answer, motion for leave to intervene by Carl Wilkenfeld, James R. Jump and Mary V. Fellabaum, and answer of intervening respondents,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion for leave to intervene be, and hereby is, granted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed.

Cook, J., would deny the motion for leave to intervene.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Mandamus. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of mandamus. Upon consideration of respondent’s answer, motion for leave to intervene by Carl Wilkenfeld, James R. Jump and Mary V. Fellabaum, and answer of intervening respondents,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion for leave to intervene be, and hereby is, granted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed.

Cook, J., would deny the motion for leave to intervene.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

78 Ohio St. 3d 1401, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-superamerica-group-v-plunkett-ohio-1997.