State ex rel. SuperAmerica Group, Div. of Ashland Oil, Inc. v. Licking Cty. Bd. of Elections

Ohio Supreme Court

State ex rel. SuperAmerica Group, Div. of Ashland Oil, Inc. v. Licking Cty. Bd. of Elections

683 N.E.2d 21, 79 Ohio St. 3d 1474, 1997 Ohio LEXIS 3641

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided August 19, 1997·No. 97-1647·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

In Mandamus and Prohibition. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for writs of mandamus and prohibition involving an expedited election matter. It appeal’s from the records of this court that relator has not filed evidence and a brief, due August 15,1997, in compliance with S.Ct.Prac.R. X(9) and therefore has failed to prosecute this cause with the requisite diligence. Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed sua sponte.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Mandamus and Prohibition. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for writs of mandamus and prohibition involving an expedited election matter. It appeal’s from the records of this court that relator has not filed evidence and a brief, due August 15,1997, in compliance with S.Ct.Prac.R. X(9) and therefore has failed to prosecute this cause with the requisite diligence. Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed sua sponte.

State ex rel. SuperAmerica Group, Div. of Ashland Oil, Inc. v. Licking Cty. Bd. of Elections, 683 N.E.2d 21, 79 Ohio St. 3d 1474, 1997 Ohio LEXIS 3641 (Ohio 1997).

Pincite

683 N.E.2d 21 (State ex rel. SuperAmerica Group, Div. of Ashland Oil, Inc. v. Licking Cty. Bd. of Elections) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related