State ex rel. SuperAmerica Group, Div. of Ashland, Inc. v. Adzic

Ohio Supreme Court

State ex rel. SuperAmerica Group, Div. of Ashland, Inc. v. Adzic

676 N.E.2d 123, 78 Ohio St. 3d 1419, 1997 Ohio LEXIS 589

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedMarch 3, 1997

Docket97-359

StatusPublished

This text of 676 N.E.2d 123 (State ex rel. SuperAmerica Group, Div. of Ashland, Inc. v. Adzic) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. SuperAmerica Group, Div. of Ashland, Inc. v. Adzic, 676 N.E.2d 123, 78 Ohio St. 3d 1419, 1997 Ohio LEXIS 589 (Ohio 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

In Mandamus and Prohibition. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for writs of mandamus and prohibition and was considered in a manner prescribed by law. Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that relator’s claim in prohibition be, and hereby is, dismissed. Relator’s claim in mandamus remains pending and will proceed pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. X.

Douglas, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Mandamus and Prohibition. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for writs of mandamus and prohibition and was considered in a manner prescribed by law. Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that relator’s claim in prohibition be, and hereby is, dismissed. Relator’s claim in mandamus remains pending and will proceed pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. X.

Douglas, J., not participating.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

676 N.E.2d 123, 78 Ohio St. 3d 1419, 1997 Ohio LEXIS 589, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-superamerica-group-div-of-ashland-inc-v-adzic-ohio-1997.