State ex rel. Sumatra Oil Corp. v. District Court of the Ninth Judicial District

Montana Supreme Court

State ex rel. Sumatra Oil Corp. v. District Court of the Ninth Judicial District

401 P.2d 288, 145 Mont. 598

CourtMontana Supreme Court

DecidedApril 14, 1965

DocketNo. 10944

StatusPublished

This text of 401 P.2d 288 (State ex rel. Sumatra Oil Corp. v. District Court of the Ninth Judicial District) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Montana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Sumatra Oil Corp. v. District Court of the Ninth Judicial District, 401 P.2d 288, 145 Mont. 598 (Mo. 1965).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

On the 14th day of April, 1965, being the return day of the Order to Show Cause issued on April 6, 1965, there personally appeared before the Court, R. G. Anderson, Esq., of the firm of Aronow & DeGrandpre, attorneys for the applicant, Sumatra Oil Corporation; Franklin S. Longan, Esq., of the firm of Longan & Holmstrom, attorneys for the respondent Court and Honorable R. D. McPhillips, Judge thereof; Selden S. Frisbee, Esq., of the firm of Frisbee & Moore, attorneys for Ralph E. Fair, the court authorized lessee.

Thereupon R. G. Anderson, Esq., moved the court to dismiss its Order to Show Cause and further moved to dismiss this original proceeding for the reason that all matters in connection therewith had been resolved and fully settled by agreement of all parties. The motions were concurred in by Messrs. Longan and Frisbee.

Now therefore, the Court being full advised in the premises, and in pursuance of the motions and stipulations of counsel;

It is ordered that the Order to Show Cause dated April 6, 1965, returnable April 14, 1965, be, and it hereby is, dismissed and vacated.

It is further ordered that this original proceeding be, and it hereby is, dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

On the 14th day of April, 1965, being the return day of the Order to Show Cause issued on April 6, 1965, there personally appeared before the Court, R. G. Anderson, Esq., of the firm of Aronow & DeGrandpre, attorneys for the applicant, Sumatra Oil Corporation; Franklin S. Longan, Esq., of the firm of Longan & Holmstrom, attorneys for the respondent Court and Honorable R. D. McPhillips, Judge thereof; Selden S. Frisbee, Esq., of the firm of Frisbee & Moore, attorneys for Ralph E. Fair, the court authorized lessee.

Thereupon R. G. Anderson, Esq., moved the court to dismiss its Order to Show Cause and further moved to dismiss this original proceeding for the reason that all matters in connection therewith had been resolved and fully settled by agreement of all parties. The motions were concurred in by Messrs. Longan and Frisbee.

Now therefore, the Court being full advised in the premises, and in pursuance of the motions and stipulations of counsel;

It is ordered that the Order to Show Cause dated April 6, 1965, returnable April 14, 1965, be, and it hereby is, dismissed and vacated.

It is further ordered that this original proceeding be, and it hereby is, dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

401 P.2d 288, 145 Mont. 598, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-sumatra-oil-corp-v-district-court-of-the-ninth-judicial-mont-1965.