State ex rel. Sultaana v. Eighth Dist. Court of Appeals
25 N.E.3d 1083, 141 Ohio St. 3d 1477
Opinion
In Mandamus and Prohibition. This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of relator’s motion to take judicial notice and motion to take judicial notice of “newly public record request.” It is ordered by the court that the motions are denied as moot.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State ex rel. Sultaana v. Eighth Dist. Court of Appeals, 25 N.E.3d 1083, 141 Ohio St. 3d 1477 (Ohio 2015).
25 N.E.3d 1083 (State ex rel. Sultaana v. Eighth Dist. Court of Appeals) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.