State ex rel. Strothers v. Wertheim

Ohio Supreme Court

State ex rel. Strothers v. Wertheim

676 N.E.2d 121, 78 Ohio St. 3d 1418

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedFebruary 28, 1997

Docket97-187

StatusPublished

This text of 676 N.E.2d 121 (State ex rel. Strothers v. Wertheim) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Strothers v. Wertheim, 676 N.E.2d 121, 78 Ohio St. 3d 1418 (Ohio 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

Cuyahoga App. No. 71185. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga County. On February 20,1997, appellee filed a second supplement pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. VII(3). Appellee’s supplement does not contain the proof of service required by S.Ct.Prac.R. XIV(2)(C). Whereas S.Ct.Prac.R. XIV(2)(C) prohibits the filing of a document that does not contain a proof of service,

IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that appellee’s supplement be, and hereby is, stricken.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cuyahoga App. No. 71185. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga County. On February 20,1997, appellee filed a second supplement pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. VII(3). Appellee’s supplement does not contain the proof of service required by S.Ct.Prac.R. XIV(2)(C). Whereas S.Ct.Prac.R. XIV(2)(C) prohibits the filing of a document that does not contain a proof of service,

IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that appellee’s supplement be, and hereby is, stricken.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

676 N.E.2d 121, 78 Ohio St. 3d 1418, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-strothers-v-wertheim-ohio-1997.