State ex rel. Strothers v. Sweeney

680 N.E.2d 154, 79 Ohio St. 3d 1415, 1997 Ohio LEXIS 1876
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedJune 18, 1997
Docket97-776
StatusPublished

This text of 680 N.E.2d 154 (State ex rel. Strothers v. Sweeney) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State ex rel. Strothers v. Sweeney, 680 N.E.2d 154, 79 Ohio St. 3d 1415, 1997 Ohio LEXIS 1876 (Ohio 1997).

Opinion

In Mandamus. On motion to dismiss and on answer of respondent. Motion to dismiss sustained. Cause dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Cook, JJ., concur. Pfeifer, J., would grant an alternative writ. Lundberg Stratton, J., would grant the writ and order that copying be done “at cost.”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
680 N.E.2d 154, 79 Ohio St. 3d 1415, 1997 Ohio LEXIS 1876, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-strothers-v-sweeney-ohio-1997.