State ex rel. Striker v. Frary

2011 Ohio 4705, 130 Ohio St. 3d 81
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedSeptember 21, 2011
Docket2011-0570
StatusPublished

This text of 2011 Ohio 4705 (State ex rel. Striker v. Frary) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State ex rel. Striker v. Frary, 2011 Ohio 4705, 130 Ohio St. 3d 81 (Ohio 2011).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

{¶ 1} We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals denying a writ of mandamus to compel appellees, Richland County Common Pleas Court Clerk Linda Frary and Mansfield Municipal Court Clerk Daniel F. Smith, to provide access to certain records pursuant to R.C. 149.43, Ohio’s Public Records Act. As to the records that Striker requested but claims he did not receive, appellees have no duty to provide records that they did not possess. See State ex rel. Striker v. Smith, 129 Ohio St.3d 168, 2011-Ohio-2878, 950 N.E.2d 952, ¶ 28. Nor was Striker entitled to records that he requested initially in his mandamus complaint. State ex rel. Am. Civ. Liberties Union of Ohio, Inc. v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Commrs., 128 Ohio St.3d 256, 2011-Ohio-625, 943 N.E.2d 553, ¶ 33. Appellees complied with their applicable duties.

Judgment affirmed.

O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, Cupp, and McGee Brown, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2011 Ohio 4705, 130 Ohio St. 3d 81, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-striker-v-frary-ohio-2011.