State ex rel. Striker v. Frary
This text of 2011 Ohio 4705 (State ex rel. Striker v. Frary) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
{¶ 1} We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals denying a writ of mandamus to compel appellees, Richland County Common Pleas Court Clerk Linda Frary and Mansfield Municipal Court Clerk Daniel F. Smith, to provide access to certain records pursuant to R.C. 149.43, Ohio’s Public Records Act. As to the records that Striker requested but claims he did not receive, appellees have no duty to provide records that they did not possess. See State ex rel. Striker v. Smith, 129 Ohio St.3d 168, 2011-Ohio-2878, 950 N.E.2d 952, ¶ 28. Nor was Striker entitled to records that he requested initially in his mandamus complaint. State ex rel. Am. Civ. Liberties Union of Ohio, Inc. v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Commrs., 128 Ohio St.3d 256, 2011-Ohio-625, 943 N.E.2d 553, ¶ 33. Appellees complied with their applicable duties.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2011 Ohio 4705, 130 Ohio St. 3d 81, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-striker-v-frary-ohio-2011.