State ex rel. Streicher v. Ruehlman

737 N.E.2d 51, 90 Ohio St. 3d 1446, 2000 Ohio LEXIS 2693
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 24, 2000
Docket00-1844
StatusPublished

This text of 737 N.E.2d 51 (State ex rel. Streicher v. Ruehlman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State ex rel. Streicher v. Ruehlman, 737 N.E.2d 51, 90 Ohio St. 3d 1446, 2000 Ohio LEXIS 2693 (Ohio 2000).

Opinion

In Prohibition. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of prohibition. Upon consideration of the city of Cincinnati’s motion for stay of trial court proceedings or temporary restraining order,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion for stay or temporary restraining order be, and hereby is, denied.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by. the court that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., Resnick, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur. F.E. Sweeney, J., would only deny the motion. Douglas, J., dissents and would grant an alternative writ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
737 N.E.2d 51, 90 Ohio St. 3d 1446, 2000 Ohio LEXIS 2693, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-streicher-v-ruehlman-ohio-2000.