State Ex Rel. Stone v. MacQuarrie

Supreme Court of Minnesota

State Ex Rel. Stone v. MacQuarrie

206 N.W. 645, 165 Minn. 488, 1925 Minn. LEXIS 1177

Supreme Court of Minnesota·Decided December 24, 1925·No. No. 24,984.·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This ease involves facts similar to those in the case of State ex rel. Stone v. Probst, supra, page 361. It relates, however to another child of plaintiff who was afflicted with a sore throat at the same time as the one involved in the other case, but defendant in this case being a- principal of a different school. Upon authority of the opinion in that case, the order herein is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This ease involves facts similar to those in the case of State ex rel. Stone v. Probst, supra, page 361. It relates, however to another child of plaintiff who was afflicted with a sore throat at the same time as the one involved in the other case, but defendant in this case being a- principal of a different school. Upon authority of the opinion in that case, the order herein is affirmed.

Affirmed.

State Ex Rel. Stone v. MacQuarrie, 206 N.W. 645, 165 Minn. 488, 1925 Minn. LEXIS 1177 (Mich. 1925).

Pincite

206 N.W. 645 (State Ex Rel. Stone v. MacQuarrie) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related