State Ex Rel. Stine v. Atkinson

23 N.E.2d 637, 136 Ohio St. 72, 136 Ohio St. (N.S.) 72, 15 Ohio Op. 580, 1939 Ohio LEXIS 229
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided November 22, 1939·No. 27722·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

*73 By the Court.

Under Section 1345-13, General Code (116 Ohio Laws, pt. 2, 286, 298), the power of appointment was exercised by the Unemployment Compensation Commission, subject to the civil service laws, but under Section 1346-1, General Code (Section 2, S. B. No. 57, 93 General Assembly, 118 Ohio Laws, —), the powers and duties of that commission were vested solely in the administrator of the Bureau of Unemployment Compensation.

Assuming relator was lawfully appointed and unlawfully dismissed as alleged, the administrator is the only person to whom a writ of mandamus may issue compelling reinstatement of the relator. Section 12283, General Code.

The demurrer will be sustained for misjoinder of respondents and the relator will be granted 20 days in which to plead further.

Demurrer sustained.

Weygandt, C. J., Day, Zimmerman, Williams, Myers, Matthias and Hart, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State Ex Rel. Stine v. Atkinson, 23 N.E.2d 637, 136 Ohio St. 72, 136 Ohio St. (N.S.) 72, 15 Ohio Op. 580, 1939 Ohio LEXIS 229 (Ohio 1939).

23 N.E.2d 637 (State Ex Rel. Stine v. Atkinson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State ex rel. Alford v. Willoughby Civil Service Commission
390 N.E.2d 782 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1979)
United Steelworkers v. Doyle
77 Ohio Law. Abs. 385 (Mahoning County Court of Common Pleas, 1958)
Stine v. Atkinson
44 N.E.2d 372 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1942)