State ex rel. Stewart v. Clinton Cty. Bd. of Elections

Ohio Supreme Court

State ex rel. Stewart v. Clinton Cty. Bd. of Elections

923 N.E.2d 157, 124 Ohio St. 3d 1514

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided March 15, 2010·No. 2010-0434·Published

Opinion

In Mandamus and Prohibition. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of mandamus and prohibition involving an expedited election matter. Upon consideration of the motion of Patrick Haley to intervene as respondent,

It is ordered by the court that the motion to intervene is granted. Haley’s evidence and brief are due on the same date as respondents’ evidence and brief.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Mandamus and Prohibition. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of mandamus and prohibition involving an expedited election matter. Upon consideration of the motion of Patrick Haley to intervene as respondent,

It is ordered by the court that the motion to intervene is granted. Haley’s evidence and brief are due on the same date as respondents’ evidence and brief.

State ex rel. Stewart v. Clinton Cty. Bd. of Elections, 923 N.E.2d 157, 124 Ohio St. 3d 1514 (Ohio 2010).

Pincite

923 N.E.2d 157 (State ex rel. Stewart v. Clinton Cty. Bd. of Elections) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.