State ex rel. Stewart v. Circuit Court of the 11th Judicial Circuit

116 So. 2d 424
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedDecember 16, 1959
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 116 So. 2d 424 (State ex rel. Stewart v. Circuit Court of the 11th Judicial Circuit) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State ex rel. Stewart v. Circuit Court of the 11th Judicial Circuit, 116 So. 2d 424 (Fla. 1959).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon the suggestion for writ of prohibition filed in this cause for an order directing and commanding the Circuit Court of the Eleventh Judicial Circuit of Florida not to proceed with the consideration of this cause and not to award judgment in favor of plaintiff therein against the relator, the Court finds that, after the rendition of its mandates in the cases of Berger v. Leposky, Fla.1958, 103 So.2d 628 and Stewart v. Berger, Fla.1959, 109 So.2d 765, the said Sam B. Berger, without first having obtained permission of this Court so to do,1 filed a bill in the nature of a bill of review in the Circuit Court of the Eleventh Judicial Circuit of Florida which sought to set [425]*425-aside and vacate the decree of said Circuit Court which was the subject matter of the litigation and was finally adjudicated in the aforementioned cases in this Court. It is thereupon,

Ordered that, pursuant to the provisions of Section 4(2) of Article V of the Florida Constitution, F.S.A., authorizing this Court to issue all writs necessary or proper to the complete exercise of its jurisdiction, the Honorable Pat Cannon, Circuit Judge ¡of the Eleventh Judicial Circuit of Florida be, and he is hereby, ordered to proceed no further in chancery case No. 59 C 4776 and hereafter, on motion, to dismiss said cause with prejudice or else to show cause before this Court on the 11th day of January, 1960 why he should not be required so to do.

It is so ordered.

THOMAS, C. J., and TERRELL, HOB-SON, ROBERTS and DREW, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lesperance v. Lesperance
257 So. 2d 66 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1971)
State Ex Rel. Paluska v. White
162 So. 2d 697 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1964)
King v. L & L INVESTORS, INC.
136 So. 2d 671 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1962)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
116 So. 2d 424, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-stewart-v-circuit-court-of-the-11th-judicial-circuit-fla-1959.