State ex rel. Stern v. Mascio
692 N.E.2d 211, 81 Ohio St. 3d 1506, 1998 Ohio LEXIS 975
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State ex rel. Stern v. Mascio. Read the opinion of the Court — 75 Ohio St. 3d 422 →
Opinion
In Mandamus. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of mandamus. On March 20, 1998, respondent filed an answer that was due March 19, 1998. Rule XIV(1)(C) of the Rules of Practice of the Supreme Court prohibits the filing of an answer that is not timely tendered for filing. Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that respondent’s answer be, and hereby is, stricken.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State ex rel. Stern v. Mascio, 692 N.E.2d 211, 81 Ohio St. 3d 1506, 1998 Ohio LEXIS 975 (Ohio 1998).
692 N.E.2d 211 (State ex rel. Stern v. Mascio) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.