Home/Supreme Court of Louisiana/State Ex Rel. Stepter v. Whitley

State Ex Rel. Stepter v. Whitley

661 So. 2d 480, 1995 WL 608556
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedOctober 13, 1995
Docket93-KH-2346
StatusPublished
Cited by137 cases

This text of 661 So. 2d 480 (State Ex Rel. Stepter v. Whitley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State Ex Rel. Stepter v. Whitley, 661 So. 2d 480, 1995 WL 608556 (La. 1995).

Opinion

661 So.2d 480 (1995)

STATE ex rel. Monroe STEPTER
v.
John P. WHITLEY, Warden.

No. 93-KH-2346.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

October 13, 1995.

Writ granted in part; case remanded. The timeliness provisions of C.Cr.P. art. 930.8(A) do not apply to motions to correct illegal sentences made under La.C.Cr.P. art. 882, which states that illegal sentences "may be corrected at any time." State ex rel. Foucha v. C.D.C., 93-1001 (La. 9/2/94), 642 So.2d 1274; State ex rel. Johnson v. Day, 92-1022 (La. 5/13/94), 637 So.2d 1062. The district court is therefore ordered to rule on the merits of relator's claims that he received an illegally indeterminate sentence. If relator did receive such a sentence, the district court must resentence him to the required determinate sentence. La.C.Cr.P. art. 879; State ex rel. Thomas v. State, 94-2767 (La. 12/9/94), 647 So.2d 1102; State ex rel. Dawson v. Ballard, 460 So.2d 595 (La.1984); see also State v. Telsee, 388 So.2d 747, 749 n. 2 (La.1980). As to all of relator's other claims, which do not relate to the legality of the sentence itself under the applicable statutes, relator's application is denied because the court correctly treated these issues as forming the proper basis for an application for post conviction relief, time-barred in relator's case. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8; State ex rel. Glover v. State, 93-2330 (La. 9/5/95), 660 So.2d 1189.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Hamlin
174 So. 3d 140 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2015)
State v. Alexander
152 So. 3d 137 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 2014)
State v. Mayes
982 So. 2d 265 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2008)
State ex rel. Telsee v. State
902 So. 2d 1008 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 2005)
State v. Smith
885 So. 2d 513 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 2004)
Sampia v. Cain
Fifth Circuit, 2002
State ex rel. Thomas v. Ward
690 So. 2d 28 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1997)
State ex rel. Haisch v. State
690 So. 2d 29 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1997)
State ex rel. Armstead v. State
690 So. 2d 34 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1997)
State ex rel. Reuben v. State
688 So. 2d 530 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1997)
State ex rel. Jackson v. State
688 So. 2d 525 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1997)
State ex rel. Williams v. State
688 So. 2d 489 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1997)
State ex rel. Miles v. State
687 So. 2d 397 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1997)
State ex rel. Finley v. State
687 So. 2d 386 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1997)
State ex rel. Harrin v. State
687 So. 2d 383 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1997)
State ex rel. Nicholas v. Nineteenth Judicial District Court
682 So. 2d 756 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1996)
State ex rel. Wiggins v. State
682 So. 2d 732 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1996)
State ex rel. Demouchet v. State
681 So. 2d 366 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1996)
State ex rel. Livas v. State
681 So. 2d 374 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1996)
State ex rel. Pierce v. State
681 So. 2d 378 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
661 So. 2d 480, 1995 WL 608556, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-stepter-v-whitley-la-1995.