State ex rel. Steele v. State

744 So. 2d 1273, 1999 La. LEXIS 2814
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided September 24, 1999·No. No. 99-KH-0738·Published

Opinion

JOHNSON, J.,

would grant the writ for the following reasons:

It is well settled that Louisiana courts must allow criminal defendants to wear civilian clothing during trial. Reasonable delay is appropriate to accommodate a defendant’s right to be tried in his own clothes and moreover, works no hardship on the state, State v. Spellman, 562 So.2d 455, 456 (La.1990).

The record reflects that defendant’s counsel informed the trial court that they were waiting for defendant’s family to bring civilian clothing to the court. Rather than granting a short recess, the trial proceeded, and defendant was compelled to stand trial in prison attire.

Compelling a criminal defendant to stand trial in readily identifiable prison attire is inherently prejudicial. I would grant defendant’s writ application and remand this case to the trial court for an evidentiary hearing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. Steele v. State, 744 So. 2d 1273, 1999 La. LEXIS 2814 (La. 1999).

744 So. 2d 1273 (State ex rel. Steele v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Spellman
562 So. 2d 455 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1990)