State ex rel. Steele v. City of Festus

2 S.W.3d 848, 1999 Mo. App. LEXIS 1869, 1999 WL 731735
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 21, 1999·No. No. ED 75670·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

[849]*849ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiffs-police officers appeal from the grant of summary judgment in favor of defendant-city on their action to recover additional wages for work performed.

We have reviewed the record on appeal and find the judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. No error of law appears. A written opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only, setting forth the reasons for our decision.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. Steele v. City of Festus, 2 S.W.3d 848, 1999 Mo. App. LEXIS 1869, 1999 WL 731735 (Mo. Ct. App. 1999).

2 S.W.3d 848 (State ex rel. Steele v. City of Festus) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kaufman v. St. Charles County
30 S.W.3d 242 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2000)