State ex rel. State v. Jaap-Vollstedt

Court of Appeals of Oregon

State ex rel. State v. Jaap-Vollstedt

7 P.3d 738, 169 Or. App. 194, 2000 Ore. App. LEXIS 1135

CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon

DecidedJuly 12, 2000

Docket15-97-10004; CA A107678

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 7 P.3d 738 (State ex rel. State v. Jaap-Vollstedt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. State v. Jaap-Vollstedt, 7 P.3d 738, 169 Or. App. 194, 2000 Ore. App. LEXIS 1135 (Or. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Defendant appeals from a remedial judgment of contempt for failing to pay court-ordered child support. ORS 33.055; ORS 33.105. She appeared for the hearing on this matter without an attorney. The trial court did not notify her of her right to be represented by counsel, as ORS 33.055(9) requires it to do. The state concedes that that failure was reversible error, and we agree. State ex rel Redden v. Breck, 111 Or App 404, 826 P2d 643 (1992).

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

Defendant appeals from a remedial judgment of contempt for failing to pay court-ordered child support. ORS 33.055; ORS 33.105. She appeared for the hearing on this matter without an attorney. The trial court did not notify her of her right to be represented by counsel, as ORS 33.055(9) requires it to do. The state concedes that that failure was reversible error, and we agree. State ex rel Redden v. Breck, 111 Or App 404, 826 P2d 643 (1992).

Reversed and remanded.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

7 P.3d 738, 169 Or. App. 194, 2000 Ore. App. LEXIS 1135, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-state-v-jaap-vollstedt-orctapp-2000.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack