State ex rel. State v. Jaap-Vollstedt
7 P.3d 738, 169 Or. App. 194, 2000 Ore. App. LEXIS 1135
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided July 12, 2000·No. 15-97-10004; CA A107678·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Defendant appeals from a remedial judgment of contempt for failing to pay court-ordered child support. ORS 33.055; ORS 33.105. She appeared for the hearing on this matter without an attorney. The trial court did not notify her of her right to be represented by counsel, as ORS 33.055(9) requires it to do. The state concedes that that failure was reversible error, and we agree. State ex rel Redden v. Breck, 111 Or App 404, 826 P2d 643 (1992).
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State ex rel. State v. Jaap-Vollstedt, 7 P.3d 738, 169 Or. App. 194, 2000 Ore. App. LEXIS 1135 (Or. Ct. App. 2000).
7 P.3d 738 (State ex rel. State v. Jaap-Vollstedt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hecker v. Fella
336 Or. App. 857 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2024)