STATE EX REL. STATE OF CAL., ETC. v. Lagoy

Court of Appeals of Oregon

STATE EX REL. STATE OF CAL., ETC. v. Lagoy

634 P.2d 289, 54 Or. App. 164, 1981 Ore. App. LEXIS 3639

CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon

DecidedOctober 5, 1981

Docket25724 CA 19409

StatusPublished

Cited by7 cases

This text of 634 P.2d 289 (STATE EX REL. STATE OF CAL., ETC. v. Lagoy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

STATE EX REL. STATE OF CAL., ETC. v. Lagoy, 634 P.2d 289, 54 Or. App. 164, 1981 Ore. App. LEXIS 3639 (Or. Ct. App. 1981).

Pincite

Opinion

*165 PER CURIAM.

In this proceeding brought under the Uniform Reciprocal Enforcement of Support Act (URESA), ORS ch 110, father was ordered by the Oregon trial court to reimburse the State of California for past public assistance provided to his two minor children. The award covered the period from August, 1975, through March, 1977. The California court which dissolved the marriage of father and the children’s mother on June 19, 1975, did not order support payments. Father appeals, contending URESA does not apply when there has been no California state court support order or decree. We disagree.

Under ORS 110.022(3), URESA applies whenever a duty of support "imposed or imposable by law”is found by an Oregon trial court "and includes * * * the duty to pay arrearages of support * * * .” (Emphasis added.) There is no prerequisite that the sister state issue a support order. "[T]he URESA authorizes both the finding and the enforcement of duties of support which have not been previously established in another proceeding.” Clarkston v. Bridge, 273 Or 68, 539 P2d 1094 (1975).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*165 PER CURIAM.

In this proceeding brought under the Uniform Reciprocal Enforcement of Support Act (URESA), ORS ch 110, father was ordered by the Oregon trial court to reimburse the State of California for past public assistance provided to his two minor children. The award covered the period from August, 1975, through March, 1977. The California court which dissolved the marriage of father and the children’s mother on June 19, 1975, did not order support payments. Father appeals, contending URESA does not apply when there has been no California state court support order or decree. We disagree.

Under ORS 110.022(3), URESA applies whenever a duty of support "imposed or imposable by law”is found by an Oregon trial court "and includes * * * the duty to pay arrearages of support * * * .” (Emphasis added.) There is no prerequisite that the sister state issue a support order. "[T]he URESA authorizes both the finding and the enforcement of duties of support which have not been previously established in another proceeding.” Clarkston v. Bridge, 273 Or 68, 539 P2d 1094 (1975).

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

634 P.2d 289, 54 Or. App. 164, 1981 Ore. App. LEXIS 3639, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-state-of-cal-etc-v-lagoy-orctapp-1981.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack